| Marine Network of Local Groups |
|
|
Home
Contacts
Membership
Latest News
Latest Newsletter Our Guide to Whales and their Survival
Our 'Guide to British Marine Animals'
MARINET video on the Impact of Marine Aggregate Dredging
|
Fathoming 'Sand Waves'Peter Waller of Felixstowe has been studying papers on Sand Waves and their mobility, and following much reading has come up with an interesting analysis. His studies of numerous papers have shown that Sand Waves can move at various velocities depending on their location, the sea depth, tides, currents, wave climate and the surface wind speed and direction. The velocity of their movement has been noted as 5-10 m per year and even as much as up to 600m per year. They can become more mobile if disturbed by the the sea bed being 'reactivated' in their vicinity by disturbance such as cable or pipe line laying, and of course dredging. Furthermore they can move in the direction of the tide or current or against it! Sand wave height is proportionate to sea depth; they can be up to and even over 10m in height in deep water. Sand banks may have sand waves on their sides, and, if they are below water at high tide sand they can have further waves on top, the size dependent on depth and other variables noted above. Relict sand and gravel deposits such as that primarily targetted by the aggregate dredgers may also be covered with sand waves, so it seems reasonable to deduce that dredging relict deposits covered by sand waves will reactivate the sand wave field. These sand waves cover a large proportion of the North Sea bed, so it is reasonable to assume that due to the large areas dredged, sand waves have been compromised. (see page 28 of 'Modelling offshore sand waves' (see below) and in many papers that appear by searching Google for modelling+offshore+sand+waves. The large "relict deposits" dredged to the east of the Scroby sandbank off Great Yarmouth are likely to have been covered by sand waves, whilst Scroby itself may also be covered with sand waves. Thus, by reactivating the sand wave field to the east of Scroby, Scroby itself would logically be compromised. Sand waves would move/fall down the sand bank slope with gravity as an additional catalyst) so with the impact of greater wave energy could lead to considerable sand bank loss. Under these conditions it is unclear whether Scroby will ever recover! If Peter's theory is correct there are serious implications for other dredge areas and sand banks which absorb wave energy so protecting the coast! Sadly, Peter has been unable to find any empirical studies of sand waves to date, those noted below are papers using mathematical/computer modelling formulae. But he will continue to seek and find hopefully with more information to come later. For detailed information on Migrating Sand Waves see:Migrating sand waves
Modelling offshore sand waves
So what we have so far appears to be based upon computerised theory and as far as we can ascertain has not been tested by field studies nor backed up by empirical evidence, as expounded and backed up in by the article by Peter Lanyon 'WORK IN PROGRESS AT SIZEWELL' — by the sea, by the dredging companies and by Marinet which appeared on our website in August 2007 that is to be found by visiting www.marinet.org.uk/mad/sizewell.pdf (see page 3). Amongst others this article quotes the following references:
Individual MARINET pages can be searched for words or phrases by pressing your Ctrl and F keys together
To search the whole of MARINET use the Search Box above — Search Engine provided by "FreeFind" |
|